James Kent Trotter vs Filip Pieczonka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Kent Trotter vs F. Pieczonka

James Kent Trotter
JPN
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
21
-
Height
-
187
C. Rank
861
170
Best Rank
739
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$120.8K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Filip Pieczonka
POL
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
21
-
Height
-
187
C. Rank
861
170
Best Rank
739
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$120.8K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-To-Head: Trotter 1 - 0 Pieczonka
They have played 3 sets in total, with James Kent Trotter winning 2 and Filip Pieczonka winning 1. The last match between James Kent Trotter and Filip Pieczonka was at the Cleveland Challenger, 28-01-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-6(4).
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Trotter | 1 |
Pieczonka | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) Cleveland Challenger(01-28-25)
James Kent Trotter
6
3
7
Filip Pieczonka
3
6
6
J. K. Trotter vs F. Pieczonka H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$120,795 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.46% (114-81) | Career Total W/L | 57.43% (58-43) |
1 | Indoor | 0 |
3 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. K. Trotter vs F. Pieczonka Match Preview
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), James Kent Trotter has won 49.07% of points on their second serve, while Filip Pieczonka has won 46.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show James Kent Trotter, in recent form, has won 44.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Filip Pieczonka has won 45.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.18% and 23.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: James Kent Trotter has saved 59.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Filip Pieczonka has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year James Kent Trotter has won 56.45% of matches played (W/L 35/ 27), with Filip Pieczonka winning 55.32% (W/L 35/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: James Kent Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 39/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7). Filip Pieczonka has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, James Kent Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17), where as Filip Pieczonka has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with James Kent Trotter winning 1 times and Filip Pieczonka being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with James Kent Trotter winning 2 and Filip Pieczonka winning 1. The last match between James Kent Trotter and Filip Pieczonka was at the Cleveland Challenger, 28-01-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, James Kent Trotter has played against opponents with an average rank of 261.97 while Filip Pieczonka has played against players with an average rank of 412.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, James Kent Trotter has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Filip Pieczonka has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, James Kent Trotter has converted 25.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Filip Pieczonka has converted 22.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
James Kent Trotter vs Filip Pieczonka Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. K. Trotter vs F. Pieczonka H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
16 | Games Won | 15 |
12 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
2:5:30 | Avg. Match Time | 2:5:30 |
64% (54/85) | 1st Serve % | 52% (49/94) |
80% (43/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (39/49) |
65% (20/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (24/45) |
100% (1/1) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
33% (31/94) | Return Pts Won % | 26% (22/85) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Trotter 51%, Pieczonka 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Trotter 45%, Pieczonka 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Trotter 63%, Pieczonka 59%.
J. K. Trotter Recent Matches Played
F. Pieczonka Recent Matches Played

J. K. Trotter vs F. Pieczonka Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.46% (114/81) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.43% (58/43) |
55.07% (250/204) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.21% (127/95) |
52.09% (2359/2170) | Games Win/Loss | 53.38% (1128/985) |
58.04% (65/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.00% (9/11) |
36.36% (4/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.73% (37/26) |
64.06% (41/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (12/6) |
50.00% (4/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.72 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
1587 | Aces Total | 415 |
0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
572 | Total Double Faults | 386 |
1:40:51 | Average Match Time | 1:15:51 |
384.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 410.99 |
60% (7827/13153) | 1st Serve % | 53% (2677/5044) |
76% (5985/7827) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (1975/2677) |
51% (2722/5326) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1154/2367) |
38% (398/1058) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (210/501) |
36% (4782/13246) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2050/5168) |
50.00% (4/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.00% (0/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
28.57% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
61.15% (85/54) | Challenger W/L | 40.91% (9/13) |
60.53% (23/15) | Futures W/L | 62.03% (49/30) |
58% (112/193) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (55/97) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
54% (51/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (14/28) |
64% (42/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (9/22) |
90% (99/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (55/48) |
10% (99/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (55/6) |
26% (96/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (45/9) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:30 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.3
W2
1.62
08:00 AM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.34
W2
1.6
11:00 AM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.85
W2
1.85
04:00 AM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.21
W2
3.92
10:30 AM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
4.15
W2
1.189
03:30 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.33
W2
3.04
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
11:00
H2H 5-2
11:00
H2H 1-2
08:30
H2H 0-2
10:50
H2H 0-2
08:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Chengdu Open - Chengdu
China
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou
China
Laver Cup - San Francisco
United States
Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Austria
Columbus Challenger
United States
Orleans Challenger
France
St. Tropez Challenger
France
Targu Mures 2 Challenger
Romania
Villa Maria Challenger
Argentina
M15 Budapest
Hungary
M15 Forbach
France
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kayseri
Turkey
M15 Kursumlijska Banja
Serbia
M15 Melilla
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Otopeni
Romania
M25 Falun
Sweden
M25 Guiyang
China
M25 Nevers
France
M25 Pardubice
Czech Republic
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy
M25 Setubal
Portugal
M25 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Takasaki
Japan
M25 Tamworth
Australia
M25 Zlatibor
Serbia